Proceedings of TDWG : Conference Abstract
|
Corresponding author: Joel Sachs (joel.sachs@agr.gc.ca)
Received: 27 Aug 2017 | Published: 28 Aug 2017
© 2017 Joel Sachs, Luke Thompson, Nazir El-Kayssi, Satpal Bilkhu
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation: Sachs J, Thompson L, El-Kayssi N, Bilkhu S (2017) Using MIxS: An Implementation Report from Two Metagenomic Information Systems. Proceedings of TDWG 1: e20637. https://doi.org/10.3897/tdwgproceedings.1.20637
|
|
MIxS (Minimum Information about any Sequence) (
The EMP (
Ecobiomics is a joint project of multiple GoC departments and involves the complete workflow, from sampling in a variety of aquatic, soil, and benthic environments, through sample prep, DNA extraction, library prep, sequencing, and analysis. In contrast to the EMP—where some of the samples and metadata had been collected before the establishment of the MIxS standards—the Ecobiomics project has been able to create metadata profiles for each sub-project to conform to, extend, and build, upon the existing MIxS standards.
Despite these two different contexts, EMP and Ecobiomics encountered a number of common issues that prevented a complete implementation of MIxS. These issues include ambiguous term names and definitions; inconsistencies amongst the environmental packages; non-standard ways of dealing with units; and a number of issues surrounding ENVO (the Environment Ontology), which is required for filling out the mandatory MIxS fields "Environmental material", "Biome", and "Environmental feature". We will describe these issues, and, more generally, the successes and challenges of our implementations.
Metagenomics, metadata, MIxS, eDNA, amplicon sequencing
Luke Thompson and Joel Sachs