Information systems like Xper3 and Fulgoromorpha Lists On the Web (FLOW) play a crucial role in managing and using biological data. These platforms store extensive collections of normalized data and structured taxonomic descriptions. By using controlled terminologies, they standardize the vocabulary, significantly enhancing the processes of identification, description, and comparison of various taxa. The massive assemblages of data hosted in these repositories could be reused to generate texts in natural languages automatically. The most immediate goal is to produce, from these information systems, more accessible and user-friendly displays in the form of taxon summary pages.

This automated production of textual outputs is a great addition that can be continuously updated as the databases evolve. Can structured data be reused to provide better species pages and to ensure updating if the data evolves? Will AI assist in this process, or will specific computing be needed? To address these questions, multiple possible approaches have been identified.

The most basic level of this process involves converting a single line from a taxon-by-character matrix into text that resembles natural language, similar to the descriptions found in botanical or zoological guides. The primary goal is to move beyond the rigid format of matrix lines or lists of characteristics (such as characters and states) of a species, and instead generate a coherent, easy-to-read paragraph intended for human eyes.

To achieve this objective, a first solution is given by Descrxp, a tool currently developed in conjunction with Xper. The user specifies the desired key outline for the output, and Descrxp fills this canvas using the database contents. While this approach is highly reliable and adaptable to various contexts, its drawback is being labor-intensive, and requiring significant human input and oversight (Fig. 1).

The second solution uses AI. Data on well-known taxa, and on more obscure taxa have been tested with ChatGPT 3.5 or 4.0. ChatGPT succeeds well at generating natural language descriptions for well-known taxa (Fig. 2), providing text that appears accurate and coherent due to the extensive information available online for these groups.

However, when it comes to more obscure taxa, less represented on the internet, the results can be more inconsistent and unpredictable (Fig. 3). This variability can be explained by the quality of the data the model has been trained on, which is significantly richer for well-known species. Consequently, for lesser-known groups, the generated descriptions may lack the precision and reliability seen with more familiar taxa.

However, if more careful attention is given to the output of chatGPT (Fig. 4), it is possible to notice that the AI filled part of the description with inaccurate characters. Due to its inability to recognize specific scientific terminology, and to process hierarchical information, chatGPT ends up producing an over-generalized and redundant description.

To go further, it would be possible to use a comparison between taxa to produce a text that highlights the remarkable features of a taxon. Moreover, it could be interesting to try and synthesize several lines of the initial matrix to extract generalized descriptions of groups of taxa, such as the description of a genus based on its included species.

Using data from FLOW, Fishbase, and Xper3, the French ACDC (Counterfactual Learning for Controlled Data-to-text) project is creating a variety of text outputs. These range from "fill-in-the-blank" canvas to fully AI-generated content, utilizing data matrices derived from these pilot databases.